The Legend of the Sword v’s The Legend of the real King Arthur II.

With the imminent release of Guy Ritchie’s new King Arthur movie, The Legend of the Sword, now is the perfect time for a quick ancient British history lesson.

 

While Guy is peddling the French romantic fiction of a would-be King pulling a sword from a stone, mentored by a grey haired wizard called Merlin; the truth of King Arthur makes for a much better blockbuster. (Does anyone know Mel Gibson’s number?)

The first King Arthur was born during the 4th Century, son of Magnus Maximus, himself the son of Constantine the Great. Born 355AD and dead by 388AD, King Arthur I fought the Romans and went down within the annuals of the Welsh Khumry as a great and illustrious king.

Later in the 6th Century King Arthur II was born, of which so many of today’s legends are based on.  King Arthur II was born in 503AD and died in 579AD, famed for fighting the Saxons, son of King Maurice, who himself was the son of the Paramount King Pendragon King Theoderic.

Both King Arthur I and II were directly related to each other, both in a long line of Kings reaching back to the first King of Britain, King Brutus and further back to the Holy Family, descended from Anne, sister of Mary, mother of Jesus Christ himself. King Brutus, a great grandson of Aeneas of Troy, came to the Island of Britain around 500BC.

Since the beginning of the 18th Century AD there has been a major suppression of British History. To the academic community there is only the tunnel vision mentality of Roman Britain, or Saxon Britain, or Viking Britain, and if any major finds are made by archaeologists they inevitably end up in one of the three mentioned categories, heaven forbid they be Khumric-British – of which there are VAST amounts of evidence and written material to blown the fake history away.

Further reading:

cropped-stats-booming.jpg

King Arthur Decoded.

APRIL 28, 2016 – 

Growing up I’ve heard about King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table. Of how Guinevere, Arthur’s wife, ran off with Sir Lancelot. I heard the stories about the sword in the stone; where only a special person could pull the sword from the stone and be the rightful king. But to me these were just that- stories; tales of fiction, similar to trolls and dragons and vampires and space cowboys.

So when I discovered Arthur WAS REAL I was blown away! Not only was he real, but he was an AMAZING man! Not only was he an amazing man but he was connected to THE MOST AMAZING MAN THAT EVER WAS! Arthur was a resonance of JESUS CHRIST. You would think this amazing fact should be known by everyone! But the information is blatantly suppressed due to the ones ruling our world today who don’t want to lose their control if this info was known to the vast public.

Read more: http://rosettedelacroix.com/?p=2038

6836b-boycott-guy-ritchie-king-arthur-films

stats-booming

Boycott Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur Films

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword – Comic-Con Trailer – Official Warner Bros. UK          

Boycott Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur Films

With the PR machine of Warner Brother’s Movie Studios rolling into full gear, the hype, thrills and spills of Guy Ritchie’s new King Arthur movie is now hitting the internet and going viral.

STOP!

Guy Ritchie is peddling medieval French romantic rubbish that an ancient British King pulled a sword from a stone to claim his birth-right, while being advised by a grey haired wizard called Merlin.

REAL ANCIENT BRITISH HISTORY

Covered-up by consecutive European royal families who have invaded our British shores since 1066, the truth about our ancient British kings has been suppressed and lost to the mists of time.

Read more: Simmering in Shit since 1066

http://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.com/2013/11/simmering-in-shit-since-1066.html

According to ancient Welsh manuscripts, poems and chronicles, ancient Britain was the leading Super Power in the world, with a mighty and strong royal dynasty of 80 Kings going back to the Holy Family.

In the same way that nothing we are told on TV and the newspapers is real today, so to with our history.

  • Jesus Christ didn’t die on the cross, he survived and brought Christianity to the UK before Christianity reached Rome
  • The Romans never conquered Britain
  • The Ark of the Covenant is buried in Wales
  • King Arthur II is real
  • The Dark Ages happened after asteroid debris hit the UK in 569AD
  • King Arthur II sailed to America centuries before Christopher Columbus did

Everything we’ve been told is a lie, and the King Arthur movies by Guy Ritchie are just another part of the continuing cover-up of our mighty and amazing ancient British history.

BOYCOTT GUY RITCHIE’S KING ARTHUR MOVIES

Find out more by watching these short Youtube movies:

Boycott Guy Ritchie’s Films

The Birth of King Arthur II

The Death of King Arthur II

King Arthur is Alive and Kicking.

king-arthurII-wildflower-graphics

One day King Arthur will return in our nation’s darkest hour, or so the prophecy says.

The legend of King Arthur has endured for centuries and rightly so. The reason the King Arthur legend has endured is because it’s actually true.

Unlike the fables of Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Abominable Snowman, the true story of King Arthur can be found written in the annuals of the Ancient Khumry manuscripts, better known as the ancient historical manuscripts of British history.

Rediscovered by the historical detectives Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett, there have actually been five King Arthur’s throughout British history, of which the first two were the most famous.

King Arthur I, who lived from 355AD to 388AD fought the Romans, son of Magnus Maximus, who himself was son of Constantine the Great. The second King Arthur was born in 503AD and died in 579AD, famed for fighting the Saxons, son of King Maurice, who himself was the son of King Theoderic.

Separating fact from fiction, no sword was ever pulled from a stone and Merlin wasn’t a wizard, but instead King Arthur II’s mentor and teacher. Both King Arthur I and II were directly related to each other, both in a long line of Kings reaching back to the first King of Britain, King Brutus and further back to the Holy Family, descended from Anne, sister of Mary, mother of Jesus Christ himself.

Written in the Coelbren language of the ancient British, (Welsh to be exact,) Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett contend that ancient British history is the most well recorded and chronicled history in the world.

It would appear that throughout history the tales and deeds of both King Arthurs, first recounted by 12th historian Geoffrey of Monmouth, had been rolled into one.

Boycott Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur Films.

A growing movement of historical enthusiasts are calling for the boycotting of Guy Ritchie’s new King Arthur movie set for release in 2017, criticizing it for being based on the romantic rubbish of 15th Century French writer Chretien de Troyes, and peddled on behalf of a German royal dynasty.

A growing band of patriotic Brits are claiming the real British history has been covered up since 1066, by a succession of foreign royal dynasties.

Richard Branson ‘Vooms’ to the rescue.

Just as there were two versions of the Robin Hood movies released at the same time, the ‘Boycott Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur Movie’s community’ have turned to Richard Branson’s £1 Billion ‘Voom’ initiative to finance a new King Arthur II movie to rival Guy Ritchie’s. With a budget of two million, movie producers hope to convince Richard Branson to invest his money in three blockbuster movies which tell the real story of King Arthur II, and what really happened during the Dark Ages.

From King Arthur II’s birth in Wales, to his epic battles against the Picts and Saxons, which unified Britain, to his Summer Games, to the catastrophic asteroid debris which hit Britain in 562AD, to King Arthur II’s escape to America in 575AD which a fleet of 700 ships, to his tragic assassination by a Red Indian in 579AD, its sure to be a fantastic trio of films which will rewrite history forever.

6836b-boycott-guy-ritchie-king-arthur-films87243-king2barthur33004-arthur-the-real-kingiron-bearguerrilla-democracy-view