‘I’M A VICTIM OF POLICE CORRUPTION’ – A Special Report by Harry Potter

police corruption victim front coverVoldemort is lying; I’m not a stalker;

I’ve simply been asking serious ‘pertinent’ questions about police corruption within Sussex police since 2012. It’s now six years later and my life lies in ruins.

I don’t have any regrets because the questions helped towards the prevention and detection of crime.

Once a Royal Military Policeman, always a Royal Military Policeman.

A duty of a Royal Military Policeman is to conduct criminal investigations, providing evidence to either exonerate or report persons for possible judicial or disciplinary action.

I couldn’t help myself. Up-holding the Law, preventing and detecting crime is in my blood and a passion. So when I heard about the Police and Crime Commissioner elections in 2012, I couldn’t resist finding out more and getting involved.

Enter Voldemort


It was at this time, I first met a particular individual whose name I cannot mention for legal reasons, but for the purpose of this special report, I shall refer to as Voldemort.

vold1Voldemort was elected to a post in which he is tasked with holding the police to account, setting the police priorities and setting the police precept (tax).

It was six months after his election, that I started writing blogs about him.

I’ve been writing blogs about him ever since…

Within those blogs are serious pertinent questions about police corruption.

Questions such as why has the main witness in the Katrina Taylor murder of 1996, been abandoned and victimised by Sussex police.

Mr David Neilson is sick, alone and dying; hiding in a far flung corner of the UK, too scared to return home, because he fears he’ll be killed by Sussex police if he did. (And he isn’t the only one!)

Transparency questions such as the reasoning behind the conclusion of Sussex police having no knowledge, of the historical child-abuse committed against John Walson?

Questions such as what happened at the Bohemia police station in Hastings on the 12 February 2009; a serious case of murder, committed by Sussex police, as reported by Brian Setchfield?

Specific and detailed questions based on personal testimonies of the victims of police corruption. Serious pertinent questions about police corruption, including murder cover-up, historical child-abuse and serious police misconduct.

vold2You would have thought Voldemort would have been obliged to answer, especially considering his public role.

According to his witness statement which he lodged with the Royal Courts of Justice in London , he admits in his own words, “My role is to hold the Chief Constable of Sussex Police to account for the performance of the police force, effectively making the police answerable to the communities they serve.”

But no, Voldemort decided to remain quiet, dodge the serious pertinent questions and pretend police corruption doesn’t exist. He said:

“At first we decided to try a policy of ignoring and not engaging, the policy completely failed.”

Can you believe it? A civil servant who under his own admission, concedes to the task of holding the performance of the police force to account, (answerable to the communities they serve), but yet adopts a policy of ‘ignoring’ and ‘not engaging’ with a member of the public; over the serious and pertinent issue of police corruption.

Nobody wants to be the baby in a corner ignored. I don’t. This is grown up business and serious pertinent stuff. Members of the public were contacting me with their stories of police corruption; and having approached Voldemort, (but having got no satisfactory answer), they contacted me with their stories, begging for action.

It was as if I was knocking at his front door and having seen him in, knocked louder and louder. The longer he remained inside, refusing to answer, the louder I knocked.

What would you have done in my position?

After a while I started to feel bitter towards him. Bitter that he ignored me, bitter and angry that he wasn’t engaging with what I was saying.

So bitter in fact, that when I caught him lying to the public, I took direct and immediate action, reporting him to the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission.)



Perhaps for the first time Voldemort’s privileged life, he felt the stinging pain of humiliation, knowing everyone looking at him knew he’d been referred to the CPS, because he may have committed a criminal offence, lying to influence the outcome of an election.

I bet Voldemort was furious; furious, vengeful and committed to getting his own back.

“DAMN HARRY POTTER, for putting me in such a position.”

With the taxpayer’s purse open to give as much as it needed, and a corrupt police force happy to throw all its resources; Voldemort enacted his revenge with swift and merciless fury.

“I want him in prison.”

It kicked off with a dawn raid, led by the gallantly brave, DC Andy Grimwood, through the front window of the idyllic farm cottage of Parkfield Farm in Crawley Down.

As a result of the material and computer seized on that occasion, I’ve since been accused of possessing two indecent pictures, one a category B picture of a teenage girl and a mature woman, and a second picture depicting a family incest orgy drawn in the manga style.

I vehemently deny all charges of knowingly downloading prohibited and illegal images from the internet.

I am a victim of police corruption and all charges against me are false charges, based on the influence of Voldemort and his demonic minions within Sussex police.

My arrests to date are:

20 February 2017    Dawn raid at Crawley Down accused of harassment and stalking

May 2017                   Arrested for downloading child porn (the worse day of my life

June 2017                 Arrested for breaking the bail conditions enforced against me, following the arrest for downloading and possessing child porn.

The condition read that I wasn’t allowed any unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18, without their guardians or parents knowing about the investigation. I interpreted it that I would be allowed unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18, if their guardian or parent knew about the investigation; but NO, DC Grimwood clarified that the interpretation meant I wasn’t allowed any unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18, with or without the guardians or parents knowing about the investigation. I politely asked the duty custody sergeant to amend the wording of the bail condition to reflect DC Grimwood’s interpretation, but she refused, and I was told to sign it otherwise I’d be thrown back into the police cell.

I subsequently didn’t see my children for 93 days and come June 2017, when the bail condition expired, I was ordered back to Salford police station to re-sign, to which I refused because I wasn’t prepared to sign for a bail condition that meant one thing on paper and another thing verbally.

October 2017            Arrested for allegedly making a malicious video about the alleged satanic cult leader, Ricky Dearman.

It’s been eight months since I was arrested for allegedly making a malicious video about actor Ricky Dearman, eight months in which all my IT equipment, consisting of two desktops, an iPad, and smart phone, has been held by Sussex police.

I recently asked the CPS whether they are going to charge me or not, but was told it wasn’t ‘appropriate’ to be told, and that I should seek legal representation to ask on my behalf. Having sought legal representation, I’m politely told it’ll cost £200 an hour to discuss my case further.


I am a victim of police corruption and Voldemort is doing everything he can to ruin me, for daring to stand up and bring him down.

“I did not stalk Voldemort; I took the piss out of him… I didn’t harass him, I hackled him. There is a difference; one isn’t illegal, and perfectly acceptable in certain circumstances.

The fact in law that preventing and detecting crime makes the offence of harassment null and void; I should never have been arrested in the first place.

Voldemort is misusing the harassment and stalking laws, to cover-up his own failed policy of ‘ignoring’ and ‘non-engagement’ with the public, he is tasked to serve.


To learn more about my story as a victim of police corruption, contact me by email to carry on his discussion. harrypotter@hotmail.com.

Subscribe to my regular news-letter, with links to more stories, reports and videos.

Read more: Porn Ruined Me…


An email to Mr Grimwood from John Paterson

Dear Mr Grimwood
This Movie is made for Police Officers and Firefighters, I really do hope you circulate among your colleagues, especially Sgt Mullins, Inspector Lovell, PC Daniel Turk, PC Alistair Bachelor, DI Charlie Watson, [Voldemort], all the staff at Eastbourne custody centre, and all the other officers I speak to on a daily bases.   I was brought up on a diet Dixon of Dock Green, and Dr Who, and that all changed when I was arrested and imprisoned for just doing what I thought was the right thing.
I know that “those at the top” do not want you to view this very important film, otherwise it would be part of every Police Officers training.  I know this 100 percent and I have ALL the evidence, along with many others.
Always remember that the BBC is your worst enemy and my hope is to close it down ASAP.  I have already reported the executives to Ofcom.  The phone call I believe is still on the Lap-Top you took on 8 May 2017 and dare not return it,  so what about buying , me a new one?  after all,  I do not own a TELL-LIE-VISION, and my work is very important.  And as you are aware, us old timers never give-up, we are from different stock.
It is within your grasp to literally change the world to a better place, and I know you can do it. Why?    Because there really is no other way.   Will YOU take-up the challenge?   I think so 😉
Incontrovertible – New 9/11 documentary by Tony Rooke A film for Coppers & Fire Fighters by Coppers & Fire Fighters.
“Simply put, this is not just the best film I’ve seen on 911, it’s the best film I have seen all year.” – Sergeant John Meaders, 32 year ex Californian police officer “One of the best 911 movies ever made!” – Kevin Barrett, Truth Jihad Radio “All family members of a 9/11 victim should watch this film.” – Matt Campbell, victim family member “Incontrovertible is technically brilliant” – Ian Henshall, Author ‘9/11 Revealed’ & ‘9/11 The New Evidence’ “Moving, powerful & informative” – Niels Harrit, Veteran Truth Campaigner “Artfully crafted – manages to convince cumulatively that there are still questions to answer” – Joe Gill – Journalist – Middle East Eye “Absolutely first rate! The film manages to navigate the broad aspects of 9/11, with all the complexity, and even tie it with 7/7 and JFK, while avoiding the pitfalls of discredited speculative theories. I have no hesitation in sharing this with anyone” – David Chandler, retired physics teacher.
Best regards
John Paterson
Ephesians 5:11
Clan Paterson Motto – Huc Tendimus Omnes (We all strive for this)


Blogger in Need – A Special Appeal by Matt Taylor

No one likes to be silenced, ignored and put into a corner!

I’ve been blogging since 2012 and across my three top blog platforms, I’ve attracted over 3 million views, having posted about 2,000 blogs. A top writer in the alternative media, I’m making my own contribution in bringing the sick and evil regime which controls our lives, to it’s knees.

Which brings me to my Blogger in Need Appeal

Sussex Police in conjunction with Katy Bourne, their Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) have banned my blog on grounds of harassment.


Nothing could be further from the truth

It all started when I called Katy Bourne a liar. Which is my God given right to do so, considering on the day before the 2016 PCC election she wrote on a sponsored Facebook post; that she’s never “claimed for expenses during her term in office.”

I know its a blatant lie because her office publicly published her expense claims which shows that she had indeed claimed expenses while during her term in office.

What would you have done?

Katy Bourne is paid £85,000 a year to hold the Chief Constable to account, to set the police priorities and to administer a £250 million budget. Can she be trusted with this immense responsibility while she lies about £385 worth of expenses?

According to the official definition of harassment, anyone can call another person a liar if;

  1. Its the truth

  2. Its a honest opinion

  3. Its exposing a crime

I tick all these boxes…

Its the truth, so much so that the Independent Police Complaint’s Commission (IPCC) have launched a criminal investigation into Katy Bourne, which is on-going and is expected to report it’s findings soon.

Its in my honest opinion because when I first discovered Katy Bourne had claimed expenses, (after promising the public she wouldn’t), I wrote her an email highlighting this error, to which she acknowledged her “error” and refunded a £322 train fare to Birmingham.

I’m exposing a crime, because as the IPCC investigation acknowledges; to make a false statement to influence a PCC election is a criminal breach of s106 of the Representation of the Peoples Act 1983.

As I’ve made clear on many occasions. I have not harassed anyone. I have simply delivered an extra layer of public scrutiny, which Katy Bourne welcomed when she pledged her Oath of Office.

This isn’t about me, its about victims of police crime

Since taking on the mantle of Shadow Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner (SSPCC) following the election of Katy Bourne in 2012, many people have approached me with their stories of police corruption; which have all been chronicled and reported on the SSPCC blog platform.

  • David Joe Neilson; who remains in hiding because he’s too scared to return home in fear he’s killed.
  • John Lenard Walson; whose historical child-abuse has been covered-up by Sussex Police, which means he cannot claim the compensation he’s rightly entitled to.
  • Julliette; who Sussex Police turned their back on, and lost her family home of 20 years, due to the fraudulent actions of her dead ex husband.
  • Brian Setchfield; who witnessed a possible murder at a Hasting police station, but who has since been ignored when making enquires into the police crimes committed on that day.
  • John Paterson; jailed for 6 weeks at Lewes Prison for exposing police brutality after being arrested, assaulted and jailed for no legal reason.


The fact that my blog has been banned, means that these stories have been banned too.

My SSPCC blog was originally banned in July 2016; but I successfully argued for it to be reinstated due to the IPCC investigation, which vindicated my claims Bourne lied to the public.

Now rather than approach me personally, Bourne, the Police and Mark Streater (her number one) prefer to complain about me behind my back, and use more devious means to silence me.


You wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the 24 cases of misconduct Streater investigated in relation to Sussex Police; he found all 24 cases to be ‘unsubstantiated,’ requiring no further action.

I think he banned my SSPCC blog in July 2016 because he knew the IPCC were about to launch an investigation, and the publicity their announcement would bring, would entice the public to Google Katy Bourne, which would show up the hundreds of blogs I’ve written about her; and as a result would cut short her fledging career.
In-fact since the announcement was made by the IPCC, dozens of news outlets reported on it, including the BBC, Sky News and the Police Oracle; not including the dozens of Sussex based newspapers and on-line magazines.
Its interesting to note, that many of these articles have now been removed. As one member of the public points out:
All and any mention of Katy Bourne has been wiped clean from the UK Blasting News platform, leaving the BBC the only one whose article remains.
A complaint that the electorate was misled over the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner’s expenses is being investigated by the police watchdog.

Since getting my blog back up and running, I thought I’d won and that it’ll be the end of it…

Hence I posted a further three blogs calling into question the involvement of Sussex Police in the 2015 Shoreham air-show crash and the 2016 Camber Sands tragedy.


While some people, like Andy Morton for example thinks it’s best to ‘simply’ label me a ‘crackpot conspiracists’ and deny me the ‘oxygen of publicity’; the truth remains that I’m flagging up pertinent and important issues.

Using underhand techniques to silence me will back fire.

Sussex Police have banned a blog on grounds of harassment against Katy Bourne, the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner (SPCC)
I need everyone who reads this to share it, please. We need to show Sussex Police that banning any blog (which criticises their actions) is not acceptable.
Once we lose our freedom of speech and expression, then we have lost our Soul. Our essence of being and our reason for being.
I blog about Katy Bourne and Sussex Police because I am seeing glaring discrepancies in what they do and say; which other journalists aren’t picking up on.
I still find it unbelievable that I’m the only person in Sussex to pick up on her expenses discrepancy.  The so-called Fourth Estate is failing in it’s duty to hold elected officials to account.
  • First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Socialist.
  • Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
  • Then they came for the blogger, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a blogger.
  • Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.


John Paterson and Brian Setchfield on Andy Peacher’s Radio Show -Thurs 6 Oct 2016


Exposing Corporate Frauds and Bringing Down the Chain Of Command Within the Lies Corruption Money Laundering and much more.

Freedom Talk Radio Listener based award-winning community radio station serving The Highlands Of Scotland and the towns and villages within the Caithness And Sutherland Areas.

Our name comes from Freedom Talk Liberty Justice. We broadcast Talk Radio hit music from the last 50 years plus specialist programmes, news and local community information, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Unlike commercial radio, Freedom Talk Radio is a community station.

This means we are a non-profit organisation. We are here to inform and entertain the people about how to avoid the injustices of the world as well as playing an active part in the community and providing training opportunities.



Shoreham Air-Show cover-up? A Special Report by Matt Taylor


Cover up : Noun

1. an attempt to prevent people discovering the truth about a serious mistake or crime.

There can be no denying there is a cover-up in place to hide the truth about the Shoreham air-show crash.

Its not a conspiracy theory, it’s happened.

High Court ruling: Police refused access to pilot statements over Shoreham Airshow crash.

An attempt to prevent Sussex Police discovering the truth about a serious mistake or crime on the 22 August 2015, at the Shoreham air-show, has been made after The High Court refused Sussex Police access to records held by the Air Accident Investigations Branch (AAIB), about what happened on that fateful day.

Specifically; Sussex Police are being prevented to know exactly what the pilot, Andrew Hill said in the moments after the crash, and what the data from the flight recorder revealed. The Chief Constable of Sussex Police, Giles York has been granted a copy of the cockpit footage, which former AAIB investigator Phil Giles says will provide the police with enough information to conclude their investigation.

With the public left scratching their heads as to why the AAIB are keeping crucial evidence secret, Sussex Police appear to totally understand. Detective Chief Inspector Paul Rymarz said, “We accept the reasons why our request has not been granted in full.”

But the public are none the wiser

A spokesman for AAIB said, “The AAIB is not able to release protected air accident investigation records of its own accord. Only the High Court can allow for their release. We note today’s judgment and will now release the film footage to the Chief Constable of Sussex Police.” 

As the comments from the public point out:

  • “Eleven people died in this awful event. This is a further insult to them and their families. No doubt legal arguments have been devoid of all common sense.”

While some members of the public are left guessing as to why Andrew Hill’s comments immediately after the crash are not being used in evidence:

  • “I’m guessing that these statements were taken without a caution being given. The pilot has rights, as does any other defendant in a potential criminal investigation.”
  • “Your right. But “Unsolicited” comments made outside of caution can also be used too! Especially if there is admission of guilt or innocence.”

The general consensus from the public:

  • “What a shame that the ultimate truth cannot be heard.”
  • “Surprised the High Court haven’t allowed a viewing of the material to check it as it is relevant to the case(s) being investigated.”
  • “Awful decision…… any evidence withheld could effect the outcome of an inquest , or criminal trial. the police should have authority to gain any evidence required to get the truth of what happened in shoreham. the grieving families deserve to know the truth…” 

Even Andy McDonald, the Shadow Secretary for Transport, said:

  • “It is deeply concerning investigating police officers should be hindered in this way. They should have access to any materials necessary to bring justice to the families of those who tragically lost their lives. Far too often families find themselves in an uphill struggle to establish the facts of what happened to their loved ones.”

Andrew Hill – The Miracle Man

Mystery has surrounded the Shoreham air-show crash from the very out-set. Just how Andrew Hill miraculously survived the immense fire-ball without a cut or a graze is a miracle.

At the time the AAIB report said the aircraft broke into four main pieces which came to rest close together approximately 243m from the initial ground contact, in a shallow overgrown depression to the south of the A27.

The report goes on to say that investigators are not sure whether Mr Hill attempted to eject from the craft or was forcibly removed due to the significant impact. Investigators wrote: ‘During the initial part of the impact sequence the jettisonable aircraft canopy was released, landing in a tree close to the main aircraft wreckage. During the latter part of the impact sequence, both the pilot and his seat were thrown clear from the cockpit.’

Andrew Hill has been at the centre of the police investigation into the Shoreham Air-show disaster which claimed the lives of 11 men one year ago.

He spent weeks in an induced coma but miraculously survived and has since made a full recovery.

He was first spotted on his feet again last October when he was pictured walking in jeans and denim shirt, carrying a water bottle.

Police interviewed him under caution last December. He was not arrested. Then five months after the August 22 tragedy, images emerged of him driving a £40,000 Porsche Boxster.

Andrew Hill

Having already uncovered a cover-up involving Sussex Police, it comes as no surprise that they find themselves embroiled in another.

The country’s leading conspiracy researcher Chris Spivey has been vocal in his belief that the Shoreham air-show crash was a false flag event in the same league as the 7/7 London bombing, the Woolwich murder and the Paris attacks.

He said in his article “The Shoreham Plane Crash Part 1” dated 09 September 2015

Chris Spivey

“The Shoreham plane crash is without doubt the most easily pulled apart government hoax that I have investigated to date.

Indeed, it would seem that the more ambitious the hoaxes get, the more the script writers have to try and shore the old fanny up with the usual tell tale signs that point to a fraud having been committed – which is a bit of a Catch 22 situation for them really.

Mind you, it is no exaggeration to say that the Shoreham Flight Shite needed a lot of shoring up and as such every single indicator of a government hoax had to be brought into play… Or at least it did in their minds.

But all the same, having said that I also have to say that the hoax was a mighty ambitious project by anyones standards – especially going on their past Am-Dram efforts – and indeed, it must doubtlessly have taken an awful lot of planning as well as having been a logistical nightmare to set up.”

In light of Chris Spivey’s allegations that not everything is what it seems, I asked Sussex Police to comment on his allegations and this is how they responded:

Dear Matthew,

I write in connection with your request for information relating to Shoreham Air Show.

I can confirm your request has now been considered and I am not obliged to supply the information you have requested. 

Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires Sussex Police, when refusing to provide such information (because the information is exempt) to provide you the applicant with a notice which:   

(a) states that fact, 

(b) specifies the exemption in question; and 

(c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.

The exemptions applicable to the information refused are;

Section 30 – Investigations and proceedings conducted by the Public authority. 

Section 30 is a class based qualified exemption and there is a requirement to consider the public interest to ensure neither confirming or denying information is held is appropriate.

Overall Harm in Confirming or Denying that Information is held
Modern-day policing is intelligence led which is particularly pertinent with regard to any current investigation.  The National Intelligence Model is adhered to by all police forces across England and Wales.  It is a business process with an intention to provide focus to operational policing and to achieve a disproportionately greater impact from the resources applied to any problem.  It is dependant on a clear framework of analysis of information and intelligence allowing a problem solving approach to law enforcement crime prevention techniques.  To confirm whether or not Sussex Police  has carried out a specific investigation  would undermine the ongoing operation..
The prevention and detection of crime is the foundation upon which policing is built.  The Police Service has a clear responsibility to prevent crime and arrest those responsible for committing crime or those than plan to commit crime.  By confirming whether or not a specific line of enquiry has been used could directly influence the stages of that process, jeopardise current investigations, HM Coroner’s investigation, prejudice future law enforcement, the judicial process and any subsequent civil proceedings.
In order to fully investigate incidents it is vital that the police have the ability to work together, where necessary covertly, to obtain intelligence within current legislative frameworks to assist in the investigative process to ensure the successful arrest and prosecution of offenders who have committed offences.

Section 30
Factors favouring complying with Section 1(1)(a) confirming that information is held
Confirming or denying that information exists relevant to this request would lead to a better informed public improving their knowledge and understanding of the investigatory process and may encourage individuals to provide intelligence in order to assist with investigations and reduce crime which could assist with the apprehension and prosecution of offenders, as all police investigations are publicly funded, confirmation that information is held would provide transparency with regard to the allocation of force budgets.
This in turn would highlight where police resources are being targeted and the public are entitled to know how public funds are spent, particularly in the current economic climate.
Factors against complying with Section 1(1)(a) confirming or denying that any other information is held
Confirmation that information is held would prejudice how investigations are carried out in the future by revealing details of investigative activity.  This would hinder the prevention and detection of crime and affect Sussex Police law enforcement capabilities.  Confirmation would also undermine the partnership approach to investigations. To disclose where these investigations are being undertaken to the world would seriously undermine the prevention or detection of crime and the force’s future law enforcement capabilities.
Balancing Test
The points above highlight the merits of confirming or denying whether information pertinent to this request exists.  The Police Service is charged with enforcing the law, preventing and detecting crime and protecting the communities we serve.  As part of that policing purpose, various tactical tools may be used to gather information relating to high profile investigative activity.
Weakening the mechanisms used to monitor any investigative activity and specifically current and ongoing investigations could weaken that process.
In addition any disclosure by Sussex Police that places an investigation at risk, no matter how generic, would undermine any trust or confidence individuals have in us.  Therefore, at this moment in time, it is our opinion that for these issues the balance test favours neither confirming nor denying that information exists.
No inference can be drawn from this refusal that information is or isn’t held.
Yours sincerely
Roger Brace
FOI Officer 

Or in other words; its none of your business and we wouldn’t tell you anyway!

“The Shoreham plane crash is without doubt the most easily pulled apart government hoax that I have investigated to date.”

While Chris Spivey contends that the people who died that day were MI5 constructs and that the whole event was a staged event for reasons not yet fully understood; others like leading ufologist Richard Lennie and astrophotographer John Walson, pointed the blame to a UFO collision.

Sussex Police were quick to reply to the UFO crash theory by saying how “very grateful” they were for the information, but not so forthcoming when accused of being involved in a cover-up. (of which it appears they are becoming quite adapt in doing so.)

Make no mistakes, a cover-up is in full swing and everyone knows it.

Even local MP’s are calling for changes to the law after hearing that Sussex police were refused access to potentially crucial information about the cause of the Shoreham Airshow crash.

Brighton Pavilion MP and joint Leader of the Green Party Caroline Lucas said: “This judgment appears to hinder a crucial police investigation into this tragic incident, and it could set a worrying precedent. We need an open justice system that best learns from the past and prevents tragedies like this occurring.”

While Portslade and Hove Labour MP, Peter Kyle said “We are testing the boundaries of this law but that shouldn’t prohibit giving the families of victims the justice they need. If they can’t sort this out then maybe the law needs to be re-examined.”

Unrelenting in his goal of covering up what actually happened that day, Justice Singh said allowing police access to the statements made by Andy Hill would cause a “serious and obvious chilling effect which would tend to deter people from answering questions by the AAIB with the candour which is necessary. This would seriously hamper future accident investigations and protection of public safety by the learning of lessons which may help prevent similar accidents.”

He also denied access to details of experiments and tests because the reports were likely to be made public in the AAIB’s final findings and because there was “no reason why the police could not themselves investigate”.

James Healy-Pratt, the head of aviation at Stewarts Law lawyer who is representing six victims’ families, welcomed the judgment as a “significant development” which he hoped would speed up the investigation.

He added: “There are no real surprises here and this is the expected result.”

Detective Chief Inspector Paul Rymarz from Sussex Police said the ruling would allow his team to progress the investigation, adding: “We understand legally this case is without precedent in England and Wales and we accept the reasons why our request has not been granted in full.”

“As we have said before, this is an extraordinarily complex investigation, but we remain committed to finding answers for the families and friends of those who died.”

The very fact the AAIB have with-held information which Sussex Police went to the High Court to release, tells us the power struggle which is going on behind the scenes. As the Queen herself once alluded to; there are dark forces at work in this country of which the public have little or no knowledge about.

In much the same way that six healthy fit young men do not drown in rip-tides off Camber Sands, so too, doesn’t a pilot survive unscathed from an infernal fire ball which disintegrates his plane and kills 11 men on the ground.

The AAIB know the truth but they aren’t telling us.

Be it a UFO collision or a false flag event; there is a cover-up in full swing regarding the Shoreham air-show crash and that’s a fact!

Further Reading: